INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Volume IX, Number 4 August,
2007
Copyright © 2007 Chenault Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Web Site
Review: Management goes to the movies
By Tom Chenault
Okay, movie buffs, now you
have another reason for watching movies, which would be to improve your
management skills. Different movies
depict different business problems. This
web site can be used, for a small price, to download “study guides” on certain
movies. For example, in the movie, Big, which falls under the category of
“creativity”, Tom Hanks plays a 30-year-old, that was transformed from a
13-year-old. Somehow he ends working for
a major New York toy company as a marketing executive. Ever met a marketing coach? In Big,
a 13-year-old mind shows adults a little common sense and how to be in touch
with the customer.
The web site is
organized in different ways, such as by topic (e.g. corporate succession,
entrepreneurship, leadership, leveraging
resources, revolutionary vision, and
the role of the firm, sales, team pride, corporate raiders, etc.) You can
also look up the movies by title.
They
also have the “MANNY” awards, which is a way to vote for the best business
movie. There is a trivia quiz. There is a sample study guide to examine a
movie case study, which is the Wizard of
Oz, under the category of leadership.
“They used the Oz story as a metaphor for issues of accountability,
arguing that Dorothy and her team succeeded only after they stopped blaming
others for their problems, stopped waiting for someone to wave a magic wand and
started taking responsibility for their own destinies.” Well, that sounds familiar.
These
days, certification seems to be the “in” thing in business. In an effort to get around a slow job market,
there seems to be a certification for everything. With this web site, you can become a
Hollywood MBA, if you pay a $10 fee and make a 100% on the 50 question exam (http://moviesforbusiness.com/exam.asp).
One of the greatest movies
of all time, regarding business decision making, is Godfather I. This movie
falls under the category of “the role of the firm.” In the beginning of the movie, they establish
the importance of loyalty and how that plays into long-term strategy. Certain favors are granted with the
understanding that those favors will be returned in the future.
However, the main theme of
the movie is about transition in terms of leadership, the changing marketplace,
and what role the Corleone organization
plays in the future. The long-term goal
is to convert the business into a non-criminal one by moving from New York to
Nevada.
Meanwhile, they are confronted by other organizations
to form a drug cartel. Don Corleone
(CEO) feels this is a very dangerous in a legal sense and an immoral road to
take. There is also the risk of losing
alliances with police, the newspapers, and politicians, who are all on the
“payroll.” In addition, it conflicts
with the long-term move.
As with many business situations, egos are allowed to
triumph over logic and conflict ensues. In
the end, Corleone, Inc. settles their problems out-of-court and eliminates
their competition with various forms of technology.
Other great movies: We will never forget are High Noon and Zulu (leveraging resources), Citizen
Kane (succession), Twelve O’clock
High (team pride), Gung Ho
(corporate culture), and Wall Street
(corporate raiders).
Check out “Movies for
Business”. This could be a way to make
otherwise boring management training sessions an interesting experience.
Sarbanes-Oxley hammers small
public companies
By Steve Marr
In the wake of the Enron collapse, Congress passed the
Sarbanes-Oxley bill hoping to put the brakes on corporate scandals; but -- like
similar government actions -- the bill hurts shareholders instead of correcting
the situation.
Congressmen argued that by requiring CEO’s
to personally certify financial statements--creating reams of additional
paperwork -- it would clean up the scandals.
But the annual cost--for public companies
with sales under $100 million -- is a whopping $850,000. For many, that’s the difference between
profit and loss. For others, it
translates to losing a lot of earnings per share.
“Like similar government actions -- the bill hurts shareholders instead of correcting the situation initiative.”
Small companies need to be small and
nimble, in order to react in the marketplace. Placing burdens on them only cuts shareholder
returns. As it is, companies spend
billions to comply with regulations, with very little obvious benefit to
shareholders.
Rather than require firms to comply with
complex filings, why not let the free market operate and do its job? Why not let these companies decide if they
want to conform to Sarbanes-Oxley? That
way, shareholders could decide if the so-called benefits are real or not. These investors could decide to invest only
in companies in compliance with the law -- if they perceive benefits -- or
choose those which decide to save the costs.
In ancient Judah, King Josiah said of some
people, “No accounting shall be made with them for the money delivered into
their hands, for they deal faithfully” (2 Kings 22:7 NASB). True, some deal faithfully while others do
not. But the free market is the best
arbitrator of such things, not our federal government.
Reprinted with permission
of the Cato Institute www.cato.org,
copyright 2007.
Steve
Marr is the former CEO of the fourth largest import-export firm in the U.S., a
company which facilitated international trade for many of the largest companies
in America.
Quotes
Worth Noting
“There is nothing as useless as doing efficiently that which
should not be done at all.” – Peter Drucker
“Sarbanes-Oxley
corporate governance rules enacted in 2002 has become a nightmare and should be
scrapped as soon as possible. It has discouraged
risk-taking and is driving foreign companies to shun the New York Stock
Exchange for the lighter rules in London.” – Alan Greenspan
“Eccentricity is not, as dull people would have us
believe, a form of madness. It is often
a kind of innocent pride, and the man of genius and the aristocrat are
frequently regarded as eccentrics because genius and aristocrat are entirely
unafraid of and uninfluenced by the opinions and vagaries of the crowd.” -- Edith Sitwell,
English biographer, critic, novelist, & poet (1887 – 1964